|
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Thursday,
September 23, 2004
CONTACTS:
Sandy
Harrison 916/ 731-5428, cell 916/996-2406;
sacramentosandy@hotmail.com
Mark
Capitolo 916/ 372-3729, cell 916/267-8894; mark@capitolo.net
STUDY
FINDS NEED FOR
THREE
STRIKES REFORM
A
study released today by the Justice Policy
Institute found
California
’s “three-strikes” sentencing law
extremely out of step with the rest of the
country, and concluded that the law needs to be
reformed.
“This clearly proves the folly of imposing
these unfair and extremely wasteful life
sentences on petty, non-violent offenders,”
said Yes on 66, “Fix Three Strikes” campaign
leader Joe Klaas. “It’s time to reform our
law, to keep repeat violent criminals in prison
for a very long time, provide fairer sentences
for less serious offenses, and to quit wasting
hundreds of millions of dollars a year.”
The report found that
California
, the only state in which a non-violent felony
can trigger a third-strike life sentence,
imprisons four times as many people under the
law as all the other states combined, despite
having just a third of the population of those
states. However,
California
didn’t enjoy a greater drop in crime than
those other states.
Additionally,
it compared
California
, a large state with a draconian three-strikes
law, and
New York
, a large state without one. It found
California
’s incarceration skyrocketing in the past
decade and
New York
’s declining. However,
New York
’s violent crime rate dropped significantly
greater rate than
California
’s.
“This
is proof positive: clearly, life sentences for
non-violent offenders don’t reduce violent
crime,” said Klaas. “Let’s change this
unjust and wasteful policy and pass Proposition
66 in November.”
|